A couple of days ago I wrote about the publishing by Boeing of its Current Market Outlook for 2013-2032. In that post I made a very brief review of it, and mentioned that I was puzzled by the change in the predicted mix of twin-aisle sales, between small and medium wide-bodies. To recall the numbers:
- small wide-bodies: from 2,720 a/c in CMO2012 to 4,320 a/c in CMO2013, whereas,
- medium wide-bodies: from 4,490 a/c in CMO2012 to 2,810 a/c in CMO2013.
Since I keep a collection of CMOs from years back, I decided to compare the figures of this wide-bodies mix along the last 15 years…
Seeing at the graphic (made using Boeing figures):
- During the first 5 years (1998-2003) the trends are quite constant.,
- From 2003 to 2007, the mix is reverted, possibly to favour the launch of the 787.
- In 2008 the CMO did not provide the split.
- From 2009 to 2013, you can see that both trends in the forecasts are erratic… why? Only Boeing knows.
The reasons why they have changed that split towards bigger widebodies is to support these arguments:
– Credibility of the 777X
– Economics of the 787-10: Supporting their current public position that this airframe will be the future best selling product of the 787 family
– Subtly infer that due to the 787-10, the average seat size will be increased for the widebodies (and that they will get this extra bite of the pie)
Good day!
Pingback: Mid-size, Twin-Aisle forecasts: the changing numbers; more Odds and Ends | Leeham News and Comment
Pingback: Airbus vs. Boeing, comparison of market forecasts (2013) | The Blog by Javier
Pingback: Is the average aircraft size decreasing or increasing by 25%? | The Blog by Javier
Pingback: Review of Boeing Current Market Outlook 2014 | The Blog by Javier
Pingback: Wide-body mix in 16 years of Boeing CMOs | The Blog by Javier
Pingback: Review of Boeing Current Market Outlook 2015 | The Blog by Javier
Pingback: Wide-body mix in 17 years of Boeing CMOs | The Blog by Javier
Pingback: Review of Boeing Current Market Outlook 2016 | The Blog by Javier